I see this from three vantage points at once.
Executive. Professor. Researcher. Each lens shows a different face of the same shift — and the gap between them is where most Fortune 500 organizations are losing competitive ground.
The Triad
The same shift looks different from each seat.
The Executive
From inside the boardroom.
Two decades leading data and AI initiatives across Fortune 100 organizations. From that seat, the alignment tax shows up as transformation programs that take three times as long as they should and strategic pivots that never reach execution.
The Professor
From inside the classroom.
Teaching the next generation of data scientists and analytics leaders. From that seat, the alignment tax shows up as graduates who think strategy and code are the same activity — and who leave traditional organizations within two years for ones that agree.
The Researcher
From the frontier.
Studying what AI capabilities actually enable, not what marketing claims they do. From that seat, the alignment tax shows up as the gap between what organizations could be doing today and what most of them will still be planning to do two years from now.
Inheritance
“Understand the customer's problem deeply enough to match the solution to the need.”
My father — two decades at IBM
“Create the conditions where curiosity emerges. You can't force learning.”
My mother — two decades teaching first grade
Both lessons turn out to be about the same thing — and both turn out to be the answer to what the alignment tax demands.
Contact me
Interested in working together? Fill out some info and we will be in touch shortly. We can’t wait to hear from you!